Create custom AEM component for Adaptive Form

Create custom component with custom name :
Goto localhost:4502/crx/de/index.jsp
Now Create Custom folder inside /apps
Custom folder : customComponent

Copy guidetextbox node from /libs/fd/af/components and paste it to /apps/customComponent

Now rename guidetextbox to customizetextbox and rename properties
componentGroup : Adaptive Form
jcr:description : Customize Text Box
jcr:title : Custom Text Box

Select cq:template and see properties section , rename jcr:title and save all changes
jcr:title : Standard Numeric Text box

Now navigate to localhost:4502/aem/forms.html/content/dam/formsanddocuments

Open Adaptive form if created or create Adaptive Form and open it
Click on + icon, search Custom Text box and drag and drop it

After drag and drop we can see one component is added to right side, in which it is showing our customize label to that input tag

So this custom Text Box is now working as textbox, this tag accepting all letters, numbers, brackets…
We can do our custom component to accept only numbers, brackets and comma
For that we need to goto localhost:4502/crx/de/index.jsp#/apps/customComponent/customizetextbox/widget.jsp
Here we can add event for our input tag

Now open the form and Preview it
Also add text box component, by which we can compare both component working
Standard Numeric Text box accepts only numbers, brackets and comma
Text Box accepts all values

Posted in CQ5 | Leave a comment

AEM 6.2 Install (Ubuntu 16.04 , 64 bit)

Create application server folder : aem-install
Copy jar file and , paste inside folder

Now open terminal and goto application server folder,
run java -jar jar name : java -jar AEM_62_author.jar

Now Application server folder looks like :

In default browser, opened application server

After login(admin/admin)

version of AEM (Version 6.2.0)

Packages installation process :
Goto http://localhost:4502/crx/packmgr/index.jsp to install packages :

1)Service Pack Install
a)Download link
Pre service pack hotfix install…
Add hotfix (pre service pack requirement) through package share.

b)Upload and Install

2)Install Service Pack (prior to installing the cumulative pack for 6.2, this is a prerequisite)
a)Download link
Install Service Pack (prior to installing the cumulative pack for 6.2, this is a prerequisite)

b)Upload and Install package

3)Install cumulative service pack (released Aug 11, 2017)
a)Download link

all and upload package

4)AEM-FORMS-6.2-SP1-CFP6-LX-3.2.112(As per Operating system)
a)Download link

b)Upload and Install

AEM version 6.2.0.SP1-CFP6

Goto http://localhost:4502/
Now here we can create adaptive forms, templates…

Posted in CQ5 | Leave a comment

20 Ideas On How To Write an investigation essay www.essayhunt com

Thus, we may possibly as well get on with the unavoidable procedure of adapting Clausewitz’s really basic concepts to the new eraand#8212even recognizing as we do so that we are thus environment the phase for the following wave of debunkers. 2.

See Edward Villacres and Christopher Bassford, ” Reclaiming the Clausewitzian Trinity ,” Parameters . Autumn 1995.

  • Critiques and Techniques:
  • Choosing the perfect Amazing Analyze Papers Online
  • HOW WE Execute OUR Product reviews
  • Our new Scores
  • The requirements our organization employ
  • Our company require our responsibility severely

3. Ibid. Creveld has badly misinterpret Clausewitz on the mother nature of the “remarkable trinity” so central to Clausewitzian concept.

Those critical reviews can certainly help!

4. Keegan, A Historical past of Warfare (New York: Knopf, 1993), 58, 381. 5. Edward N.

A lot of Voted Web-sites

Luttwak, “Towards Article-Heroic Warfare,” Overseas Affairs, May/June sometimes you’re trying to find matchless papers writing service essaygoal generally you’re trying to find curriculum vitae or preparation newspapers producing support 1995. 6. Martin van Creveld, “The Eteal Clausewitz,” Clausewitz and Contemporary Approach . ed.

Michael I.

Handel (London: Frank Cass, 1986). Tag Archives: evaluate/essay Archives categoriesThis time last week we posted a video summary for Nora Stel’s new paper. “The Agnotology of Eviction in South Lebanon’s Palestinian Gatherings: How Institutional Ambiguity and Deliberate Ignorance Shape Sensitive Spaces”. In it she discusses how and with what outcomes the engagements of Palestinian refugees with Lebanese authorities are marked by disinformation, uncertainty and ignorance. In her amazing book review essay down below, Nora (who retains positions at Maastricht School of Management, Utrecht University’s Centre for Conflict Reports, and the Issam Fares Institute for Community Plan and Global Affairs, American University of Beirut, explores associated issues in Noga Kadman’s Erased from Room and Consciousness: Israel and the Depopulated Palestinian Villages of 1948 . talking about its procedure of the output, servicing, and outcomes of collective, institutionalised amnesia, and suggesting how the examination introduced in it can both gain from and be of reward to the nascent theory of agnotology–the analyze of socially-constructed and politically-imposed ignorance.

Institutionalized Ignorance and Produced Oblivion: Looking at Noga Kadman’s Erased from Area and Consciousness from an Agnotological Point of view[1] Ignorance, like information, has a political geography, prompting us to talk to: Who understands not? And why not? The place is there ignorance and why? Like information or prosperity or poverty, ignorance has a experience, a house, and a value: it is inspired right here and discouraged there from ten thousand mishaps (and deliberations) of social fortune. It is fewer like a vacuum than a stable or shifting entire body – which travels via time and occupies area, runs roughshod in excess of people today or matters, and frequently leaves a shadow . (Proctor 2008: six) Some many years ago, I was doing analysis in the Lebanese village of Shabriha, positioned near Tyre in the southe section of the place. All through my remain in Shabriha, I to begin with failed to comprehend the importance of the truth that this identical village was often referred to as “Salha”.

It took me rather some time to realize that Salha[2] was the village, now positioned in northe Israel, the place the people that today reside in Lebanese Shabriha came from. [three] It took me even lengthier to value that though the original village of Salha was almost fully ruined, at the exact same time it continues to exist.

Posted in blog | Leave a comment

Ratings – how much should we believe in them? – Part 1

Ratings are now used in pretty much everywhere you go on the web. Google even has ratings advertized in it’s search results for the websites and the products that people want to purchase. How much can you rely on them and how much effort should you place on ratings for your site? Hopefully some of the points here will help you make those decisions.

Star ratings - good thing

Star ratings – how valuable are these?

Firstly, it really boils down to the type of business that you have, if you want ratings to help you get more customers. If you are selling shoes, let’s say, then ratings would be a good bet on what you are selling. The likely scenario is that if you have no ratings, people may assume that there is no business on your site and go to another site. If you are selling very specialized types of shoes, then that would be different. Take the example of the unique shoes offered by the site and you will see that many of it’s line of shoes do not have any type of reviews at all.


The popular site yelp has ratings on businesses that could swing users to lean on companies that have higher ratings over others that do not. But then again, we can easily overlook ratings based on the number of reviews. For example, some business establishments can achieve high ratings with a handful of customers initially and then their ratings would correspondingly go down as they have to handle more customers and possibly more problems. Make sure to check the numbers in the brackets against the rating. A five star rating with only 1 review is likely suspect but a 4 star rating with 500 reviews is more likely accurate. But then again, you might see 16 reviews with a 5 star rating which can be equally suspect especially if you read the actual reviews.


One of the problems with reviews is that there are many folks who would immediately mark a review of 1 star if the unit arrives defective. This actually derails the value of the unit and it’s worth which is basically an honest review of the working product. Manufacturers would have to ramp up their quality checks to avoid high negative ratings by those users.


The ratings have been around for a long time. Heck, I started doing ratings implementation in 2001 when I built a site to review other online dating sites that were popping up all over the place at that time. Over time the rating system has become an essential part of everyday business. Amazon attracts plenty of users based on ratings of it’s products and I often go there to review the ratings on a product before I make a purchase. Not all websites have the ‘stomach’ to advertise it’s true ratings on the product. For example, say you had a new product launched and the first review gave you a ⅕ rating, this would require some courageous effort on your part to plough advertising dollars on that specific product. You may feel the urge to ditch that random rating in favor of no rating on the product. However, there are ways to circumvent this problem and that is for the company to respond directly to the user of the rating and place it right next to theirs. In this way, a new user may come to the site and see it as something that the company is addressing and potentially a one-off problem.


In the next part of this subject, we will talk about how some companies have added bogus ratings on their product but it actually helped them to enter a very competitive market. We are not advocating such a practise but just to show you how ratings may not necessarily have the effect that you are always looking for. Stay tuned!

Posted in Productivity, Web Marketing | Leave a comment

Learning from the Michael Dell way of doing business

Most of us have heard of Michael Dell and his company Dell which pioneered the way for making mail order PCs for the masses. Whilst it was not a novel idea by any standards at that time (90s), Michael Dell was able to scale his business much faster than other businesses. You could say it was luck but we often attribute this type of success to the ingenious business minds of the founder.

Growing your business

Growing your business

Many businesses often find that bootstrapping is the way to go, meaning that the company furnishes the money that it generates from sales in order to grow the business. This seems like the sensible approach to any businesses that want to have better control over it’s destiny but it has the problems that it can remain as a mom and pop type company. However, this maybe ok for many people but people with ambition and drive, this would not be the best option.

Some businesses seek additional necessary capital by borrowing money from friends or relatives or even angel investors. In this way, they still have control over the business but they are held responsible for keeping the investors moderately happy throughout the venture. People like Michael Dell see the opportunity and their primary objective is to scale the business as massively and quickly as possible. Notice that the folks on the Shark Tank TV show (for the would be entrepreneurs) almost always use the words ‘how to scale’. Basically what they are looking for first is that the business idea/product is good and also has a viable market. The next question in their heads is how can the money they put up front lead to rapid growth and scale to a level where they can get a return on their money and more.

These are crucial questions to ask when you are a business owner and you have to decide for yourself the best course of action that fits with your needs. If you have worked on a world class product, it would not make sense to keep it incubated within a small scale, you have to push it out to the massive audience. This entails, taking your products/idea/service to parties that see value in what you are offering and can help you push it rapidly to market and to a wider audience in a short space of time. Those types of investors are typically venture capitalists and would not want to invest less than a few million dollars.

The question to the business owner is how far they want to grow and to what level? If your interest is massive scaling, then you have no option but to go for the VCs unless of course you have hundreds of thousands of dollars to invest right away. The advantage of doing this, is that you go to market quickly and your visions for the company will materialize earlier. You also end up minimizing the whole risks that you take by yourself only. The disadvantage of doing this is that you lose some share in the overall business.

The downside of this are:

  • You need to find the VCs that will take an interest in what you are doing
  • Give up some share and maybe the lead position
  • Have an aggressive business plan that meets yours and VCs expectations

They may seem like downsides but in fact they are worth sacrificing for the end result which is faster growth and turnaround with lots of sleepless nights but potentially with huge rewards.

Whatever paths you take, make sure you have looked at all your options before deciding one way or the other. The important thing is that you feel satisfied with the way things are going, because this would be important to the well being and progress of any business venture.

Posted in Business Chat | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment